UDC 811.161.3'373.46:630

Rusak Vol’ga Uladzimirauna – PhD (Philology), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Belarusian Philology. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: rusak@belstu.by

DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.52065/2520-6729-2024-285-22.

Key words: Keywords: forestry terminology, hyper-hyponymic taxonomy, antonym terms, terminological synonymy and variation, terminological polysemy and homonymy.

For citation: Rusak V. U. Рaradigmatic relations in the system belarusian forestry terminology. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 4, Print- and Мediatechnologies, 2024, no. 2 (285), pp. 160–167 (In Belarusian). DOI: 10.52065/2520-6729-2024-285-22.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of paradigmatic connections in Belarusian forestry terminology. The work analyzed the phenomena of hyponymy, antonymy, synonymy, variant, polysemy and homonymy in forestry terminology. It is noted that hyponyms, through the techniques of concretization and generalization, contribute to the ordering of terms within the system and provide an explanation of meanings. It was found that the leading property of hyponymy is the possibility of the same lexeme, which is an element of taxonomic relations, to act as both a hyponym and a hyperonym. Depending on the number of signs by which the generic name is concretized, hyper-hyponymic groups with parallel, consecutive and combined structures are distinguished. It is noted that formal-semantic and properly semantic hyponymic connections are distinguished in the Belarusian terminology of forestry. In the Belarusian forestry terminology, the following groups of antonymous terms have been identified: contradictory, contrast, vector. Within the analyzed term system, the antonymy of lexical and word-forming types is realized. Types of terminological synonyms by structural characteristics (lexical, lexical-syntactic, syntactic) were analyzed. It was found that the analyzed terminology includes terms-variants of several types: phoneticphonemic, accentual, morphological, word-forming. The phenomena of polysemy and homonymy in forestry terminology are considered. It is noted that in the analyzed field there are ambiguous terms that go beyond special fields of knowledge, inter-system and intra-system polysemantics. Compared to polysemy, homonymy in Belarusian forestry terminology has not been expanded.

Download

References

1. Khodakova A. G. Sistemnaya semantika termina. Analiz angloyazychnoy terminologii Interneta [System semantics of the term. Analysis of English-language Internet terminology]. Saarbrucken, LAP Publ., 2011. 264 p. (In Russian).
2. Sossyur F. de. Kurs obshchey lingvistiki [General linguistics course]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2019. 303 р. (In Russian).
3. Krushevskiy N. V. Essay on the Science of Language. Khrestomatiya po istorii russkogo yazykoznaniya [Reader on the history of Russian linguistics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ.,1973, рр. 417–433 (In Russian).
4. Tatarinov V. A. Leksiko-semanticheskoye var’irovaniye terminologicheskikh edinits i problemy terminografii. Avtoreferat dissertatsii kandidata filologicheskikh nauk [Lexico-semantic variation of terminological units and problems of terminography. Abstract of thesis PhD (Philology)]. Moscow, 1988. 24 р. (In Russian).
5. Kulikova I. S., Salmina D. V. Lingvisticheskaya terminologiya v professional’nom aspekte [Linguistic terminology in a professional aspect]. St. Petersburg, Lan’ Publ., 2020. 380 р. (In Russian).
6. Tolikina E. I. Some linguistic problems of studying the term. Lingvisticheskiуe problemy nauchnotekhnicheskoу terminologii [Linguistic problems of scientific and technical terminology], 1971, рр. 57–67 (In Russian).
7. Golovin B. N., Kobrin R. Yu. Lingvisticheskiye osnovy ucheniya o terminakh [Linguistic foundations of the doctrine of terms]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1987. 104 р. (In Russian).
8. Lotte D. Osnovy postroyeniya nauchno-tekhnicheskoy terminologii. Voprosy teorii metodiki [Fundamentals of constructing scientific and technical terminology. Questions of the theory of methodology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1961. 158 р. (In Russian).
9. Leychik V. M. Terminovedeniye: predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology: subject, methods, structure]. Moscow, LIBROKOM Publ., 2009. 256 р. (In Russian).
10. Shumaylova M. S. Aktual’nyye problemy razvitiya i funktsionirovaniya terminologii Internet v nemetskom yazyke. Dissertatsiya kandidata filologicheskikh nauk [Current issues of the development and funetioning of internet in the German language. Dissertation PhD (Philology)]. Omsk, 2005. 193 p. (In Russian).
11. Danilenko V. P. Russkaya terminologiya. Opyt lingvisticheskogo opisaniya [Russian Terminology. Experience of Linguistic Description]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 246 p. (In Russian).
12. Krasney V. P. About synonyms, doublets and variants in terminology. Vesnik BDU [BSU Bulletin], series 4, 1995, no. 1, рр. 25–27 (In Belarusian).
13. Ivanova G. A. Word-formation variation and norm in the metalanguage of linguistics. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky], 2010, no. 4 (2), рр. 519–521 (In Russian).
14. Kotelova N. Z. On the question of the specifics of the term. Lingvisticheskiye problemy nauchnotekhnicheskoy terminologii [Linguistic problems of scientific and technical terminology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1970, pр. 122–126 (In Russian).
15. Marchuk Yu. N. Osnovy terminografii [Terminography Basics]. Moscow, TsII MGU Publ., 1992. 76 р. (In Russian).
16. Gak V. G. Lexical meaning of the word. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Bol’shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1998, рр. 261–263 (In Russian).
17. Chistyukhina S. N. Interbranch polysemy in the terminological system of modern English. Vestnik Universiteta rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya [Bulletin of the University of the Russian Academy of Education], series Philology and Journalism, 2011, no. 1, рр. 80–83 (In Russian).

28.06.2024