SOCIO-NATURAL PRIORITIES FOR FORMING A CO-EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH IN OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL CRISIS

UDC 141.7:316.32

  • Burak Petr Mikhaylovich − PhD (Philosophy), Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, the Department of Philosophy and Law. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: bmp49@bk.ru

Keywords: priority, co-evolution, society, nature, crisis, challenge, security.

For citation: Burak P. M. Socio-natural priorities for forming a co-evolutionary approach in overcoming the challenges of the anthropological crisis. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 6, History, Philosophy, 2022, no. 2 (263), pp. 94–102 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6885-2022-263-2-94-102.

Abstract

The article develops the idea of the ability of society and nature (the biosphere) to self-development in their relationship as the most important priority and factor in the formation of an ontologically determined, co-evolutionary path in overcoming the challenges of the anthropological crisis. In this regard, an attempt was made to identify intra-system and inter-system mechanisms of self-development of biological and social systems based on the unity of dialectical, synergistic and co-evolutionary approaches. As the most important condition for the self-development of the systemic organization of biological and social objects in their interaction, the tendency of the formation of their conjugated, mutually directed, internal-external disequilibrium or activity, which determines the natural manifestation of their openness, as a precondition for the exchange of matter, energy and information and interdependent self-reproduction, is considered. Intra-system and inter-system co-evolution in their interconnection preserve and reproduce this kind of disequilibrium, forming various asymmetric ways of manifestation and implementation of material, energy and informational excess activity of self-organization of systems of biological and social nature as a condition for mastering external sources of such resources in the processes of self-development. In this context, the essential manifestations of the anthropological crisis are interpreted primarily in terms of the global self-determination of society and its interaction with nature (the biosphere). It is expressed in various forms of excess entropy in the socio-cultural life of a person. Excessive activity of society to intensify its self-development, achieved by constantly improving the technical means of influencing the biosphere to disorder its systems and withdraw resources, increasingly exceeds the capabilities of the self-healing mechanisms of the biosphere, actually curtailing the scale of its self development. Accordingly, there is a need to regulate the spontaneously emerging asymmetry of co-evolution in the spontaneous self-development of the global system “man – society – technology – nature (biosphere)”, which should include consistent regulation of the natureconsuming self-development of society and the formation of conditions for the self-development of the biosphere in order to preserve them and mutual security.

References

  1. Puchkovskiy S. V. Redundancy of living systems: concept, definition, forms, adaptability. Zhurnal obshchey biologii [Journal of General Biology], 1999, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 642– 653 (In Russian).
  2. Darenskiy V. Yu. Social redundancy of higher education: a resource for development or a factor of destructiveness? Gumanitarnyy vektor [Humanitarian vector], series: Pedagogy, Psychology, 2015, no. 1 (41). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnaya-izbytochnost-vysshego-obrazovaniyaresurs-raz-vitiya-ili-faktor-destruktivnosti (accessed 18.11.2022) (In Russian).
  3. Daymond Dzh. Krizis [A crisis]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2020. 544 p. (In Russian).
  4. Gelen A. On the systematics of anthropology. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988. 552 p. (In Russian).
  5. Demidenko E. S. Megatrends in the socio-natural development of the world and in the transformation of biospheric life. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta [Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University named after I. Kant], 2015, vol. 6, pp. 69–78 (In Russian).
  6. Demidenko E. S. Dergacheva E. A. Global death of the biosphere and the search for ways to preserve biospheric life. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow Universityt], series 27, Globalization and geopolitics, 2021, no. 2, pp. 3–19 (In Russian).
  7. Danilov A. N., Andreeva I. N., Meleshkevich E. E. Materials of the round table “Man in risk society”. Sotsiologiya [Sociology], 2013, no. 1, pp. 4–30 (In Russian).
28.11.2022