THREE PROBLEMS OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY OF THE FOREST SECTOR IN A GLOBALIZING WORLD

UDC 630*61(476)

  • Kashtelyan Taisiya Vasil’yevna − PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, the Department of Production Organization and Real Estate Economics. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: taisiya_kascht@mail.ru

Key words: world economy, forest sector, institutional transformations, digital business model, shared consumption model, strategic management, rental relations, financial distribution, drivers of ecological and economic activity, fаir distribution.

For citation: Kashtelyan T. V. Three problems of the national economy of the forest sector in a globalizing world. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and Management, 2022, no. 1 (256), pp. 93–99 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2022-256-1-93-99.

Abstract

In modern conditions of global competition, we pay little attention to the issues of the economic status of the proprietor and owner (on the terms of a concession, lease) of means of production, including the basis for the development of society – land resources. Regarding the forest economic policy aimed at creating conditions for the sustainable renewal of biological resources and their transformation based on the existing spatial environment through the involvement of institutional, innovative, industrial and other factors of socio-economic development, we analyze property relations, their rental characteristics, issues of adequacy of management to the deployment of digitalization processes, annuitization of greening.

The aim of the work is to determine the characteristics of the forest economic policy of Belarus in modern conditions and to identify the three most important problems, the successful solution of which creates prerequisites for the reorientation of production to the innovative path of development. All three problems relate to financial distribution mechanisms.

Research methods – economic analysis and interpretation, in particular, consisting in understanding the functioning of economic objects and processes. We have identified two directions for solving the problems of evolutionary economics, the first of which concerns the continuity of economic practices, the second – innovation, based on the increment of the theory of economic reality of forest bio-economics through the prism of the model of shared consumption and implementing the policy of superiority in environmental values.

The result of the research is the identification of the so-called “logical cores” of forest economic policy. The article presents the elements of the concepts of the economy of shared consumption, “reference” management, effective rental practices. The globalizing world requires the survival of the strongest economic agents. Therefore, institutional transformations of forest economic policy should include an understanding of the sources and results of the functioning of rental relations, real opportunities for positioning and protecting property rights, improving market structures in the social space and organizing ecological and economic behavior of forest sector entities adequate to the modern digital space.

References

  1. How science can put the Sustainable Development Goals back on track. The international journal of science, 2021, 21 January, pp. 1–5. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00104-0 (accessed 04.02.2022).
  2. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Green Societies. Available at: https://www.springerprofessional.de/the-impact-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-on-green-societies/18991716 (accessed 04.02.2022).
  3. The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: Emerging research needs. Environment International, 2020, November, pp. 321–327. Available at: https://www.springerprofessional.de/the-impactof-the-covid-19-pandemic-on-green-societies/18991716 (accessed 04.02.2022).
  4. Nousiainen D., Mola-Yudego B. Characteristics and emerging patterns of forest conflicts in Europe. What can they tell us? Forest Policy and Economics, 2022, vol. 136, pp. 1–10.
  5. Forest resources of Belarus. Available at: https://byles.by/poleznaya-informaciya/lesnye-resursy-belarusi.html (accessed 04.02.2022) (In Russian).
  6. Chugumbaev R. Reserves of the use of reference analysis in the management of changes in an economic entity. Sbornik dokladov VIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Collection of reports of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference]. St. Petersburg, 2021, pp. 370–374 (In Russian).
  7. Ampaabeng K., Stringer L. C., Leventon J., Ridell M., Rueff H., Spracklen D. V., Butt V. A Policymaker’s Guide to State RegData 2.0. Available at: https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/ampaabeng_broughel_mclaughlin_and_nelson_-_policy_brief_-_a_policymakers_guide_to_state_regdata_2.0_-_v1.pdf (accessed 15.01.2022).
  8. Kashtelyan T. V. Forest rent in the context of the transformation of the institutions of the economy of Belarus. Izvestiya Gomel’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni F. Skoriny [Proceedings of the Francisk Scorina Gomel State University], series Socio-economic and social sciences, 2020, no. 5 (122), pp. 121–127 (In Russian).
  9. Ostrom E. Green from the Grassroots. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/greenfrom-the-grassroots-2012-06 (accessed 03.02.2022).
  10.  Ostrom E. Upravleniye obshchim. Evolyutsiya institutsiy kollektivnogo deystviya [General Management. Evolution of collective action institutions]. Kiev, T. Montyan Publ., 2016. 400 p. (In Russian).
  11. Isachenko T. M., Revenko L. S., Platonova I. N. Sovremennyye mezhdunarodnyye ekonomicheskiye otnosheniya v epokhy postbipolyarnosti [Modern international economic relations in the post-bipolar era]. Moscow, MGIMO Publ., 2020. 771 p. (In Russian).
  12. Dougill A. G., Stringer L. C., Leventon J., Ridell M., Rueff H., Spracklen D. V., Butt V. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2011.0418 (accessed 21.02.2022).
  13. Ciuriak D. Economic Rents and the Contours of Conflict in the Data-driven Economy. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25327 (accessed 01.02.2022).
  14. World Development Indicators. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.FRST. RT.ZS (accessed 02.02.2022).
  15. Wolfslehner B., McDermott C., Kleinschmit D. European forest governance post-2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36333/fs10 (accessed 05.02.2022).
  16. Who’s collecting the rent? Taxation and the superprofits in the forest sector. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Who%27s-collecting-the-rent-Taxation-and-the-in-the-Day/33a1226d2fb2ee59d75a26a606b5063ee5fba742 (accessed 03.02.2022).
  17. Malashevich D. G. Organizational model of forestry management in Belarus: historical experience and directions of development. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], series 5, Economics and Management, 2021, no. 1 (244), pp. 139–145 (In Russian).
  18. Kashtelyan T. V. Features of rent relations in the forest complex. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], series 5, Economics and Management, 2019, no. 1 (220), pp. 41–48 (In Russian).
  19. Kashtelyan T. V. Problems of differentiation of institutional shifts in the economy and assessment of prospects
    for the development of the forest sector of Belarus. Izvestiya Gomel’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni F. Skoriny [Proceedings of the Francisk Scorina Gomel State University], 2018, no. 5 (110), pp. 133–139 (In Russian).
14.02.2022