COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDICATORS OF LINEAR GROWTH OF PINE UNDERGROWTH BEFORE AND AFTER THE REGENERATION FELLING

UDC 630*232:630*221.411:630*174.754

  • Prishchepov Aleksey Aleksandrovich – Master of Agriculture, PhD student, the Department of Silviculture. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: alexey-fox94@mail.ru

Key words: regeneration felling, Pinus sylvestris L., linear growth.

For citation: Prishchepov A. A. Comparative analysis of indicators of linear growth of pine undergrowth before and after the regeneration felling. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 1, Forestry. Nature Management. Processing of Renewable Resources, 2021, no. 1 (240), pp. 13–19 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2519-402X-2021-240-2-13-19.

Abstract

To carrying out of research three trial plots were laid on the territory of the forest fund of the Vileika Experimental Forestry in the areas with the same growing conditions (Pinetum pleuroziosum), where the first reception of regeneration felling was carried out and there is an pine undergrowth preliminary generation. One trial plot (control) was laid in an area with similar growing conditions, where regeneration felling was not carried out. On each trial plot, model specimens of pine undergrowth of preliminary generation were selected, in which the annual height growths were measured for the entire life period. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using the Student's t-test to establish the reliability of differences between the values of the growth of pine undergrowth.

As a result of the research, it was found that during the life of pine undergrowth before the regeneration felling, the differences in linear growth rates on the experimental and control trial plots are not statistically distinguishable. During the period of life after the regeneration felling, the values of linear growth on the trial plots are on average 44.3% higher than on the control trial plot. It was also found that the first reception of regeneration felling contributed to an increase in the average annual linear growth of pine undergrowth by 33.5%.

References

  1. Angal’t E. M. Analysis of the increment of pine undergrowth and young growth in pine-ash crops. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State Agrarian University], 2013, no. 6 (44), pp. 31–34 (In Russian).
  2. Machyk M. Sh. Growth of pine undergrowth in height in the conditions of Usinsky forestry. Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii [State-of-the-art research and innovation], 2016, no. 6 (62), pp. 255– 258 (In Russian).
  3. Kukhta A. E. Linear and radial increments of pine in the Volzhsko-Kamsky and Central Forest State Natural Reserves. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoy vestnik [Moscow State Forest University Bulletin – Forest Bulletin], 2010, no. 3, pp. 88–93 (In Russian).
  4. Yanbaev Yu. A. Growth dynamics of pine undergrowth on uncultivated lands. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State Agrarian University], 2018, no. 4 (72), pp. 150–151 (In Russian).
  5. Basakova I. N. Growth course of artificial plantations of pine in the conditions of the Buzuluk pine forest. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State Agrarian University], 2017, no. 2 (64), pp. 50–53 (In Russian).
  6. Kozhevnikov A. M. Changes in the current growth in spruce forests at different degrees of thinning. Lesnoye khozyaystvo [Forestry], 1973, no. 2, pp. 34–38 (In Russian).
  7. Luganskiy N. A. Lesovedeniye: uchebnik [Forestry: textbook]. Ekaterinburg, UGLTU Publ., 2010, 432 p.
  8. Tagirov V. V. Variability of annual growth in height of pine undergrowth in different forest growing conditions. Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Bashkir State Agrarian University], 2018, no. 2, pp. 139–143 (In Russian).
  9. Machyk M. Sh. Growth progress of young pine trees (Pinus sylvestris L.). Khvoynyye boreal’noy zony [Boreal conifers], 2018, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 316–321 (In Russian).
  10. Romanovskaya A. A. Variability of linear growth of plantings and natural regeneration of pine in the Penza region. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta lesnogo khozyaystva [Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Forestry], 2017, no. 1, pp. 4–13 (In Russian).
  11. Borko A. Ch. Influence of soil mineralization on the current increment of pine undergrowth in height after strip-gradual felling. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], no. 1: Forestry, 2013, pp. 61–63 (In Russian).
  12. Tagirov V. V. On the environmental and genetic components of the differences in height gain in pine on abandoned agricultural lands. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Bashkir University], 2015, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 889–891 (In Russian).
  13. Tagirov V. V. On the individual variability of the increase in height in Scots pine undergrowth on abandoned agricultural lands. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], 2015, no. 10 (185), pp. 97–99 (In Russian).
  14. Paramonov E. G. Growth rate of pine undergrowth in suburban forests. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Altai State Agrarian University Bulletin], 2012, no. 9 (95), pp. 46–48 (In Russian).
  15. Lekovskaya M. V. Effect of thinning on the current growth in height of pinetum pleuroziosum forests in Baranovichi forestry. Aktual’nyye problemy lesnogo kompleksa [Actual problems of the forestry complex], 2014, no. 39, pp. 69–72 (In Russian).
  16. Makarova N. V. Statistika v Excel: uchebnoye posobiye [Statistics in Excel: a tutorial]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2002. 368 p.
  17. Borzdova T. V. Osnovy statisticheskogo analiza i obrabotka dannykh s primeneniyem Microsoft Excel: uchebnoye posobiye [Basics of statistical analysis and data processing using Microsoft Excel: a tutorial]. Minsk, GIUST BGU Publ., 2011. 75 p.
12.10.2020