DISTRIBUTION OF NATURAL REGENERATION OF PINUS SYLVESTRIS L. DEPENDING ON THE DISTANCE TO POTENTIAL SEED SOURCES

UDC 630.174:630*524

  • Luferov Anton Olegovich – Master of Agriculture, Chief of Forest Inventory Party. Republican Subsidiary Forest Management Unitary Enterprise “Gomel’lesproekt” (35, Vstrechnaya 1-st str., 246027, Gomel, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: anton.luferov@tut.by

Key words: Pinus sylvestris L., natural forest regeneration, cutting area, glade, seed tree, border of a forest stand, forest stand.

For citation: Luferov A. O. Distribution of natural regeneration of Pinus sylvestris L. depending on the distance to potential seed sources. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 1, Forestry. Nature Management. Processing of Renewable Resources, 2022, no. 1 (252), pp. 26–35 (In Russian).DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2519-402X-2022-252-1-26-35.

Abstract

The article presents the results of the processing and analysis of experimental material to identify the influence of the location of seed sources on cutting areas, glades and in plantations not converted to forested lands on the success of pine natural regeneration. Local and foreign experience is analyzed, features and factors influencing the course of pine natural regeneration are revealed. The study was carried out on the territory of 12 forest enterprises of Belarus on 90 temporary indicator plots in upland types of growing conditions (A2B2). It was revealed that about 70% of pine natural regeneration recorded on temporary indicator plots is concentrated at a distance of up to 20 m from the nearest potential seed sources, which are represented by single seed pine trees or a border of a pine forest stand. A graphic model of the distribution of pine natural regeneration depending on the distance of potential seed sources is presented. Recommendations are given for the uniform abandonment of single seed pine trees during final cutting, which will increase the efficiency of pine natural regeneration in cutting areas (by 20% or more).

References

  1. Gosudarstvennaya programma “Belorusskiy les” na 2021–2025 gody [State program “Belarusian Forest” for 2021–2025]. Minsk, Sovet Ministrov Respubliki Belarus’ Publ., 2021. 77 p. (In Russian).
  2. Zvyagintsev V. B., Sazonov A. A. Bark beetle dieback of pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.) in the forests of Belarus. VIII Chteniya pamyati O. A. Katayeva. Vrediteli i bolezni drevesnykh rasteniy Rossii: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [VIII Readings in memory of O. A. Kataev. Pests and diseases of woody plants in Russia: materials of the International Scientific Conference]. St. Petersburg, 2014. P. 34 (In Russian).
  3. Sazonov A. A. Dieback of pine stands of Belarus (2010–????): work on mistakes. Lesnyye ekosistemy: sovremennyye vyzovy, sostoyaniye, produktivnost’ i ustoychivost’: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 90-letiyu obrazovaniya Instituta lesa NAN Belarusi [Forest ecosystems: modern challenges, state, productivity and sustainability: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the foundation of the Institute of Forestry of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus]. Gomel, 2020, pp. 279–28 (In Russian).
  4. Ryakhin V. A., Anan’yev V. A. Silvicultural assessment of natural regeneration and formation of forest stands on clear cuttings. Trudy lesoinzhenernogo fakul’teta PetrGU [Proceedings of the forest engineering faculty of Petrozavodsk State University], issue 2, 1999, pp. 124–127 (In Russian).
  5. Pugachevskiy A. V., Serenkova V. A. Assessment of reforestation processes on cutting areas of pine phytocenoses of the Belarusian Polesye. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], 2015, no. 1 (174): Forestry, pp. 83–86 (In Russian).
  6. Luferov A. O., Labokha K. V. Assistance to natural regeneration as the basic method of reforestation in conditions of dieback of pine forests. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], 2018, no. 2: Forestry. Nature Management. Processing of Renewable Resources, pp. 56–62 (In Russian).
  7. Negrutskiy S. F. Kornevaya gubka [Root sponge]. Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1986. 196 p. (In Russian).
  8. Zvyagintsev V. B., Volchenkova G. A. Transformation of the pathogenesis of the root sponge in the intensification of forestry. Gribnyye soobshchestva lesnykh ekosistem [Fungal communities of forest ecosystems], 2014, vol. 4 (5), pp. 15–25 (In Russian).
  9. Churakov B. P., Bityaev S. G. Natural forest regeneration in the foci of root sponges. Nauka v sovremennom informatsionnom obshchestve: materialy XVIII Mezhdunarodoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Science in the Modern Information Society: materials of the XVIII International Scientific and Practical Conference], 2019, vol. 1, pp. 41–43 (In Russian).
  10. Azniyev Yu. N. On the seeding and quality of pine seeds in stands of different ages in the lingonberry pine forest. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Belorusskogo lesotekhnicheskogo instituta [Collection of scientific works of BSTU], 1956, pp. 101–112 (In Russian).
  11. Mary L. Duryea. Forest Regeneration Methods: Natural Regeneration, Direct Seeding and Planting. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gainesville, University of Florida Publ., 2000, 13 p.
  12. Hannerz M., Almqvist C., Hörnfeldt R. Timing of seed dispersal in Pinus sylvestris stands in central Sweden. Silva Fennica, 2004, no. 36 (4), pp. 757–765.
  13. Denisov A. K., Denisov S. A. Interrelation of aerodynamic and sowing properties of pine seeds and its influence on seeding of felling areas. Izvestiya vuzov. Lesnoy zhurnal [Knowledge of universities. Forest Journal], 1971, no. 4, pp. 9–12 (In Russian).
  14. TCP 622–2018 (33090). Technical requirements for forest management. Allocation and inventory of felling areas in the forests of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk, Ministerstvo lesnogo khozyaystva Respubliki Belarus’ Publ., 2018. 97 p. (In Russian).
  15. Pravila rubok lesa v Respublike Belarus’ [Felling rules in the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk, Ministerstvo lesnogo khozyaystva Respubliki Belarus’ Publ., 2016. 18 p.
24.09.2021