NETWORKING AS A FACTOR IN THE GROWTH OF INNOVATION ACTIVITY EFFICIENCY

UDC 338.22:001.895

  • Ryabokon’ Anna Ivanovna − assistant lecturer, the Department of Production Organization and Real Estate Economics. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: ryabokon@belstu.by

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2022-262-2-33-39

Key words: network structures, networking, innovative development, clusters, innovation activity, digital innovation platform.

For citation: Ryabokon’ A. I. Networking as a factor in the growth of innovation activity efficiency. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and Management, 2022, no. 2 (262), pp. 33–39 (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2022-262-2-33-39.

Abstract

The article analyzes the development of network interaction in the EU countries, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Based on the statistical data of the European Innovation Scoreboard, the trends of innovative development of small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU countries are revealed. Trends in the development of joint innovation activity in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus are revealed. The foreign experience of the development of innovation cooperation was studied and the features of the implementation of joint innovation projects were noted.

Based on the results of a statistical study based on the values of the indicators of the effectiveness of innovation activity and the average growth rates of profitability of sales in the regions of the Republic of Belarus with different levels of development of cluster structures, the hypothesis about the positive impact of the development of networking on the indicators of the effectiveness of innovation activity of industrial enterprises was tested. The dynamics of innovative development of Belarusian small and medium-sized enterprises has been studied. The key problems of the development of cluster-network structures in the Republic of Belarus are identified.

The features of the development of network interaction in the conditions of digitalization and the role of digital innovation platforms in improving the efficiency of interaction between business and science are considered. Examples of the functioning of digital innovation platforms in Finland and the Russian Federation are given.

Download

References

  1. Vlasova V., Rud’ V. Cooperative strategies of enterprises in the age of open innovation: choice of partners, geography and duration. Forsayt [Foresight], 2020, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 80–94 (In Russian).
  2. Leminen S. Living labs as open innovation networks: Networks, roles and innovation outcomes. Available at: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/178993 (accessed 02.09.2022).
  3. Dezhina I., Medovnikov D., Rozmirovich S. Estimates of the demand of Russian medium-sized technological business for cooperation with universities. Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2017, no. 4 (36), pp. 81–105 (In Russian).
  4. Slonimskaya M. Living laboratories in the theory and practice of open innovation. Nauka i innovatsii [Science and innovation], 2016, no. 163, pp. 30–32 (In Russian).
  5. European and Regional Innovation Scoreboards 2021. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research-andinnovation/en/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard/eis (accessed 04.09.2022).
  6. Tsirenshchikov V. S. EU Innovation Development Strategy: new goals and initiatives. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe], 2019, no. 6 (92), pp. 138–148 (In Russian).
  7. Gokhberg L. M., Gracheva G. A., Ditkovskiy K. A., Evnevich E. I., Kuznetsova I. A., Martynova S. V., Ratay T. V., Rosovetskaya L. A., Rud’ V. A., Fridlyanova S. Yu., Fursov K. S. Indikatory innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti, 2021: statisticheskiy sbornik [Indicators of innovation activity, 2021: statistical complilation]. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2021. 280 p. (In Russian).
  8. Tomasova D. A., Shul’gina L. A. Analysis of the Russian innovation environment using the coefficient of innovation intensity of the economy. Innovatsii [Innovation], 2016, no. 12 (218), pp. 82–89 (In Russian).
  9. Cluster map. Available at: https://economy.gov.by/uploads/files/Karta-Klasterov/Karta-klasterov2022.pdf (accessed 25.06.2022) (In Russian).
  10. Statisticheskiy ezhegodnik Respubliki Belarus’, 2021: statisticheskiy sbornik [Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Belarus, 2021: statistical complilation]. Minsk, Natsional’nyy statisticheskiy komitet Respubliki Belarus’ Publ., 2021. 407 p. (In Russian).
  11. Nauka i innovatsionnaya deyatel’nost’ v Respublike Belarus’: statisticheskiy sbornik [Science and innovation in the Republic of Belarus: statistical complilation]. Minsk, RUP “IVTs Belstata” Publ., 2020. 125 p. (In Russian).
  12. Liu H., Liu Z., Lai Y., Li L. Factors Influencing Collaborative Innovation Project Performance: The Case of China. Sustainability, 2021, no. 13, p. 7380.
  13. Bykova T. P., Istomina L. A., Krupskiy D. M., Tarasevich Zh. K., Sherstneva S. P. Potentsial razvitiya klasterov v regionakh Belarusi [Potential for cluster development in the regions of Belarus]. Minsk, Kolorgrad Publ., 2019. 100 p. (In Russian).
  14.  Novikova I. V. Digital techno-economic paradigm in changing the digitalization strategy of the Republic of Belarus. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], issue 5, Economics and Management, 2020, no. 1, pp. 5–12 (In Russian).
  15. Raunio M., Nordling N., Kautonen M., Räsänen P. Open Innovation Platforms as a Knowledge Triangle Policy Tool – Evidence from Finland. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 62–76. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.62.76.
14.09.2022