CREATION AND FUNCTIONING OF COOPERATIVE AND INTEGRATION STRUCTURES

UDC 330.138.21

  • Ivanouskaya Iryna Stanislavauna − assistant lecture, the Department of Production Organization and Real Estate Economics. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: ira-nedv@mail.ru

  • Ivanouski Uladzimir Uladzimiravich − Senior Lecturer, the Department of Enterprise Economy and Management. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: ivanouski@belstu.by

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2022-256-1-100-110

Key words: concern, meso-level, added value, production forces.

For citation:Ivanouskaya I. S., Ivanouski U. U. Creation and functioning of cooperative and integration structures. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and Management, 2022, no. 1 (256), pp. 100–110 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2022-256-1-100-110.

Abstract

The article deals with the world and domestic experience in the creation and functioning of integration structures. Over the past 20 years, large-scale industrial processes have been actively taking place on the territory of the CIS countries, lost cooperation links are being restored both within the framework of the previous production circuits and beyond them in the search for new options for restoring cooperation chains. The production forces are changing, requiring institutionalization within the framework of new production relations, which are entrusted with the task of creating rapidly changing and evolutionary mesolevel structures. Most scientists note that integration structures form the industrial framework of developed countries, form the meso-level of the economy, contribute to the structuring of meso-economic relations, increase the efficiency of the economic mechanism. Researchers share the opinion that in the modern world, it is the meso-level structures that are the main link in economic management, and not an enterprise, as previously thought. Trust and syndication of industry, the creation of economic councils, research and production associations, territorial production complexes, intersectoral territorial production complexes reveal the identification of economic systems and their institutionalization in the USSR; products with high added value and high technological redistribution in the interests of its role in the division of labor. The unification of enterprises into concerns, financial and industrial groups, holdings is a continuation of the institutionalization of this search. The world has accumulated vast experience in the formation of meso-level structures, which are both losing their significance at the current moment (cartels, pools, syndicates) and continue to function, reflecting the national characteristics of the economy of countries (corporations, chaebols, keiretsu, concerns, consortiums and alliances).

Download

References

  1. Gurskiy V. L., Solodovnikov S. Y., Sergievich T. V., Melechko Y. V. Modernizatsiya belorusskoy promyshlennosti v novykh tekhnologicheskikh i ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh [Modernization of the Belarusian industry in new technological and economic conditions]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2021. 728 p. (In Russian).
  2. Gusakov V. G. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya model’: stanovleniye i razvitiye: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. V 2 knigakh. Kniga 2 [Socio-economic model: formation and development: theory, methodology, practice. In 2 books. Book 2]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2015. 401 p. (In Russian).
  3. Larionov I. K. Mezoekonomika [Mesoeconomics]. Moscow, Izdatel’skiy dom “Dashkov i K” Publ., 2001. 444 p. (In Russian).
  4. Boyko I. P. Russian concerns: recreating what was not. Vestnik SPbGU [Bulletin of SPbSU], series 5, 1999, no. 5 (issue 1), pp. 22‒39 (In Russian).
  5. Pelikh A. S., Dzhukha V. M., Kuricin A. V., Shtapova I. S., Bokov I. I., Borschevskaya V. I., Pronchenko A. G., Limanova E. Y., Sedukh Y. A. Ekonomika otrasli [Industry economics]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2003. 448 p. (In Russian).
  6. Mavrichshev V. S., Onoprienko G. K. Khozyaystvennyy mekhanizm na putyakh perestroyki [Economic mechanism on the path of perestroika]. Minsk, Belarus’ Publ., 1989. 128 p. (In Russian).
  7. Dryakhlov N. I., Davydenko V. A., Ishikova A., Zorge A., Loor K., Mochernyy S. V., Romasckina G. F., Skripnuk D. F., Yurchenko I. N. Rossiya i Germaniya: opyt transformatsiy [Russia and Germany: experience of transformations]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004. 294 p. (In Russian).
  8. Galperin S. B., Dorodeva M. V., Mishin Y. V., Pukhova E. V. Mekhanizm analiza i prognoza deyatel’nosti korporativnykh struktur [Mechanizm for analyzing and forecasting the activities of corporate structures]. Moscow, Novyy vek Publ., 2001. 57 p. (In Russian).
  9. Lenskiy E. V., Tsvetkov V. A. Transnatsional’nyye finansovo-promyshlennyye gruppy i mezhgosudarstvennaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya: real’nost’ i perspektivy [Transnational industrial groups and interstate economic integration reality and prospects]. Moscow, AFP Ezhenedel’nika “Ekonomika i zhizn’” Publ., 1998. 244 p. (In Russian).
  10. Ivanouskaya I. S., Ivanouski U. U. Organization of cooperative cooperation in the building materials industry to create high value-added products. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], 2016, no. 7 (189), pp. 218‒222 (In Russian).
  11. Baynev V. F. Industrial revolution in an post-industrial society. Belaruskaya dumka [Belarussian thought], 2017, no. 5, pp. 58‒63 (In Russian).
  12. Gubanov S. S. Derzhavnyy proryv. Neoindustrializatsiya Rosii i vertikal’naya integratsiya [State breakthrough. Neoindustrialization of Russia and vertical integration]. Moscow, Knizhnyy mir Publ., 2012. 224 p. (In Russian).
  13. Sasim A. M. Promyshlennost’ Belarusi v XX stoletii [Industry of Belarus in the 20-th sentury]. Minsk, Ekoperspektiva Publ., 2001. 271 p. (In Russian).
  14. Lenskiy E. V. Korporativnyy bisness [Corporate business]. Minsk, Armita-Marketing, Menedzhment Publ., 2001. 480 p. (In Russian).
  15. Lavrikov Y. A., Panfilov M. P., Sidorov N. Kh., Andreev V. N. Proizvodstvennyye ob’’yedineniya: organizatsiya, effektivnost’, perspektivy razvitiaya [Production associations: organization, efficiency, development prospects]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 176 p. (In Russian).
  16. Myasnikovich M. V. Prakticheskiye voprosy evraziyskoy ekonomicheskoy integratsii [Practical issues of the Eurasian economic integration]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2021. 294 p. (In Russian).
  17. Danilchenko A. On the trail of “tager”. Similarities and differences between Belorussian and South Korean economic models. Belorusskaya mysl’ [Belarussian thought], 2006, no. 3, pp. 59‒66 (In Russian).
  18. Usim V. N., Dvorcin M. D., Alperin S. V. Concept of economic and technological complex. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-ekonomiko-tehnologicheskogo-kompleksa (accessed 15.02.2022)
    (In Russian).
  19. Novikova I. V., Semenov A. Y., Maksimenko-Novokhrost T. V. Ekonomicheskoye razvitiye: modeli rynochnoy ekonomiki [Economic development: market economy models]. Minsk, TetraSistems Publ., 2021. 225 p. (In Russian).
  20. Shimova O. S. Ustoychivoye razvitiye [Sustainable development]. Minsk, BGEU Publ., 2017. 395 p. (In Russian).
  21. Daneyko A. E., Griboedova I. A., Sadovskaya T. U., Shahot’ko L. P., Ralinkovich V. A., Medvedev E. K., Cilibina V. M., Bobrova A. G., Dorozhkin S. Y., Kilin I. S., Motorina O. I., Nesterovoch D. A., Pashkevich I. V., Pileckiy I. V., Petrakova Y. N., Razorenova L. V., Trubicina Y. V., Shamshur A. V., Scherbin N. M. Sistema ekonomicheskikh institutov Respubliki Belarus’ [System of economic institutions of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2015. 279 p. (In Russian).
  22. Bykov A. A. Ekonomicheskiy rost i razvitiye [Economic growth and development]. Minsk, Vysheyshaya shkola Publ., 2021. 303 p. (In Russian).
  23. Ozhigina V. V., Shkutko O. N., Petrushkevich E. N. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya [International economic integration]. Minsk, BGEU Publ., 2017. 431 p. (In Russian).
  24. Berchenko N. G., Bogdan N. I., Bulko O. S., Vertinskaya T. S., Golovatuk V. M., Goncharov V. V., Denisuk V. A., Senchenko V. V., Solov’ev V. P. Innovatsionnoye razvitiye regionov Belarusi i Ukrainy na osnove klasternoy setevoy formy [Innovative development of the regions of Belarus and Ukraine on the basis of a cluster network form]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2015. 391 p. (In Russian).
  25. Jangam B. P. Does global value chain participation enhance domestic value‐added in exports? Evidence from emerging market economies. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2021, no. 26 (2), pp. 1681‒1694.
  26. Lukin E. V. Sectoral and Territorial Specifics of Value-Added Chains in Russia: the Input-Output Approach. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 129‒149. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.7.
  27. Hsu Bo-Xiang, Chen Yi-Min. Corporate social responsibility and value added in the supply chain: Model and mechanism. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2022, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 178–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121302.
  28. Flaig D., Greenville J. Trade Liberalization in APEC and Global Value Chain Participation: What Can Value Added Indicators Tell. Journal of Economic Integration, 2021, no. 36 (2), pp. 308‒338.
  29. Yong Liu, Qian Xu, Zhi-yang Liu. A coordination mechanism through value-added profit distribution in a supply chain considering corporate social responsibility. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2020, vol. 41 (4), pp. 586–598.
16.02.2022