SIGNIFICANCE, FACTORS AND WAYS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FOREST BIOECONOMY OF BELARUS IN SOCIOLOGICAL ASPECT

UDC 630*15

  • Kashtelyan Taisiya Vasil’yevna – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, the Department of Production Organization and Real Estate Economics. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: taisiya_kascht@mail.ru

Key words: bioeconomy, forest sector, respondents, principles of forest management, technologies, innovative development, non-market services of forests, hydrological function of forests, strategic management.

For citation: Kashtelyan T. V. Significanсe, factors and ways of innovative development of the forest bioeconomy of Belarus in sociological aspect. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and Management, 2021, no. 2 (250), pp. 83–88 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2021-250-2-83-88.

Abstract

In the modern conditions of global competition and a multidimensional pandemic crisis, the problem of achieving sustainable economic growth of economic systems is being actualized. Bioeconomy plays an important role in its solution, acting as the most important life support system based on biological resources. Bioeconomy is designed to create conditions for the sustainable renewal of biological resources and their transformation on the basis of the existing spatial environment through the involvement of institutional, innovative, industrial and other factors of socio-economic development.

The aim of the work is a sociological study of the forest bioeconomy of Belarus and the identification on this basis of factors of agent modeling of economic relations and, in general, system development under the influence of existing socio-cultural behavioral patterns.

The research method is a questionnaire survey of specialists from different sectors of the economy. In this regard, we have identified two groups of interviewed employees: the first group, which has knowledge and skills in the field of forest and forest engineering technologies; the second group, which provides training in the technologies of the chemical industry, the building materials industry, etc.

The result of the research is a sociological analysis of the existing institutional environment of forest bioeconomy. The article presents the rating results of the ranking of environmental problems solved, in particular, in the forest sectors. They are reduced to the pre-property realization of the water protection function by forests and to a more pronounced climatic orientation.

Rating assessments for the product positions of the forest sector have shown that the strategic goals of modern economic development are based on the priority of construction materials. However, rational solutions for innovative development and strategic management should accumulate the tasks of the future, including systems of creative eco-consumption.

References

  1. D’Amato D., Korhonen J. Integrating the Green Economy, Circular Economy and Bioeconomy in a Strategic Sustainability Framework. Ecol. Econ., 2021, no. 188, pp. 107–143.
  2. Chen Y., Chen C.-Y., Hsieh T. Exploration of Sustainable Development by Applying Green Economy Indicators. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 2011, no. 182, pp. 279–289.
  3. Kasztelan A. On the Road to a Green Economy: How Do European Union Countries 'Do Their Homework'? Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354678163_On_the_Road_to_a_Green_Economy_How_Do_European_Union_Countries_'Do_Their_Homework' (accessed 15.09.2021).
  4. Dolzhenko I. Modern trends in textile trade. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy uspekh [Modern economic success], 2021, no. 1, рр. 119–125 (In Russian).
  5. Zigmund B. Myslit’ sotsiologicheski [To think sociologically]. Available at: https://www.litmir.me (accesed 15.09.2021).
  6. Yadav V. G., Yadav G. D., Patankar S. C. The production of fuels and chemicals in the new world: critical analysis of the choice between crude oil and biomass vis-à-vis sustainability and the environmen. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01945-5 (accessed 11.09.2021).
  7. Hass Dzh. Sociological neoinstitutionalism and the analysis of organizations (preface to the section). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Saint Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies], 2007, no. 3, pp. 112–125 (In Russian).
  8. Fomicheva T. V. The values of Russians in the pandemic. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social policy and sociology], 2021, no. 1 (138), pp. 178–185 (In Russian).
22.09.2021