MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION ACTIVITY IN THE CONDITIONS OF NETWORK INTERACTION OF BUSINESS ENTITIES

UDC 334.78:001.895

  • Ryabokon’ Anna Ivanovna – assistant lecturer, the Department of Production Organization and Real Estate Economics. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: ryabokon@belstu.by

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2021-250-2-37-42

Key words: network structures, networking, innovative development, ranking, dynamic standard, indicators of innovative development.

For citation: Ryabokon’ A. I. Management of innovation activity in the conditions of network interaction of business entities. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and Management, 2021, no. 2 (250), pp. 37–42 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2021-250-2-37-42.

Abstract

The article considers approaches to determining the essence of network structures and issues of evaluating the effectiveness of innovative activities within the framework of network interaction of organizations.

At the moment there is no generally accepted approach to the definition of the category “network structure” in science. The author’s definition of the concept “network structure” is proposed in the article. In addition, as one of the tools for managing the innovative activities of network structures, a methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative activities in the conditions of network interaction of organizations, taking into account modern tasks of innovative development of the Belarusian economy, based on the method of the dynamic standard, is proposed. To assess the innovative development of network structures, a reference dynamic series has been developed, which is a normative model of the innovation activity regime within the framework of the network interaction of organizations. The stages are defined, an evaluation algorithm is proposed and the content of the methodology is revealed, recommendations for interpreting the conclusions are given.

Download

References

  1. Novikova I. V., San’ko G. G., Timofeeva Yu. A. Cluster as a network structure and a factor of economic growth of the national economy. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], issue 5, Economics and Management, 2018, no. 2, pp. 22–27 (In Russian).
  2. Slonimskaya M. A. Setevyye formy organizatsii ekonomiki [Network forms of organization of the economy]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2018. 279 p.
  3. Safargaliev M. F. Metodologiya upravleniya innovatsionnoy deyatel’nost’yu v setevykh proizvodstvennykh sistemakh. Dis. … dokt. ekon. nauk [Methodology for managing innovation in networked production systems. Diss. DSc (Economics)]. Kazan, 2020. 457 p.
  4. Kamenskikh M. A. Modeling cluster-network interaction in a regional innovation system. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh “Lomonosov-2016” [International Scientific Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists “Lomonosov-2016”]. Moscow, 2016, pp. 135–138 (In Russian).
  5. Panchenko V. E. Networkization of the innovation space in the context of digital transformation. EKONOMINFO [EKONOMINFO], 2019, vol. 16, no. 2-3, pp. 5–9 (In Russian).
  6. Filatova M. V. Methodology for the formation and development of the network structure of the industrial complex. RSEU [RSEU], 2020, no. 1 (48), pp. 23–26 (In Russian).
  7. Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Fit, failure and the hall of fame: How companies succeed or fail. New York, 1994. 215 p.
  8. Bonfim L. R. C., Gonçalves S. A., Segatto A. P., Jacometti M. The idea innovation network model: The case of the INDI-saude network in Brazil. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2020, no. 23 (2), pp. 250–266.
  9. Delgado M., Porter M., Stern S. Defining clusters of related industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 2016, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–38.
  10. Kaspin L. E. Monitoring and forecasting in the system of information and analytical support of innovative activities of the organization. Innovatsionnoye razvitiye ekonomiki [Innovative Development of the Economy], 2018, no. 5 (47), pp. 39–45 (In Russian).
  11. Turko V., Korshunov A. Analysis of innovative development by the dynamic standard method. Nauka i innovatsii [Science and Innovation], 2019, no. 3, pp. 31–37 (In Russian).
  12. Azarskaya M. A., Pozdeev V. L. Assessing the going concern of an organization using the dynamic rate method. Uchet. Analiz. Audit [Accounting. Analysis. Audit], 2017, no. 1, pp. 24–32 (In Russian).
  13. Kontseptsiya Gosudarstvennoy programmy innovatsionnogo razvitiya Respubliki Belarus’ na 2021– 2025 gg. [The Concept of the State Program for Innovative Development of the Republic of Belarus for 2021–2025]. Minsk, GU “BelISA” Publ., 2020. 56 p.
  14. Gosudarstvennaya programma “Maloe i srednee predprinimatel’stvo” na 2021–2025 gody [State Program “Small and Medium Enterprises” for 2021–2025]. Available at: http://www.economy.gov.by/uploads/files/gos-progr-2021-2025/gos-progr-na-2021-2025.pdf (accessed 27.08.2021).
  15. Natsional’naya strategiya ustoychivogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Respubliki Belarus’ na period do 2030 goda [The National Strategy for Sustainable Socio-Economic Development of the Republic of Belarus for the Period up to 2030]. Available at: http://www.economy.gov.by/uploads/files/NSUR2030/Natsionalnaja-strategija-ustojchivogo-sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo-razvitija-Respubliki-Belarus-na-period-do2030-goda.pdf (accessed 27.08.2021).
14.09.2021