ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF PRODUCTION PARTICIPATION IN GLOBAL ADDED VALUE CHAINS

UDC 330.138.21

  • Ivanouski Uladzimir Uladzimiravich – Senior Lecturer, the Department of Enterprise Economy and Management. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: ivanouski@belstu.by

  • Ivanouskaya Iryna Stanislavauna – assistant lecture, the Department of Production Organization and Real Estate Economics. Belarusian State Technological University (13a, Sverdlova str., 220006, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). E-mail: ira-nedv@mail.ru

Key words: rent, environmental rent, value added, global value chains.

For citation: Ivanouski U. U., Ivanouskaya I. S. Advantages and disadvantages of production participation in global added value chains. Proceedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and Management, 2021, no. 2 (250), pp. 95–101 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6877-2021-250-2-95-101.

Abstract

The publication examines the issues of enterprise participation in global value chains. Many economists and international organizations point to the need to involve the industries of developing countries in global value chains, as this leads to positive effects in the form of an inflow of foreign direct investment, the transfer of modern technologies, an improvement in the organization of production, and an increase in the incomes of workers in such enterprises. As a result of the impact of these effects in developing countries, structural shifts are expected in favor of an increase in the share of value added created by high-tech industries. However, studies carried out over the past decade show that positive changes in the economies of developing countries are occurring at an extremely slow pace, and sometimes there is a deterioration in the situation in industry and the economy. In a number of countries, subsidiaries of multinational corporations have undertaken major “internal technology upgrades”, which, however, have seldom affected the rest of the country’s economy in the form of productivity gains for domestic firms, in part because multinational corporations have weak links with local businesses and labor markets. Moving up the chain towards more capital-intensive production or the creation of more added value does not work under these conditions. The goal of international corporations is not to increase the wealth of countries whose production is included in global value chains, but to maintain profitability and flexibility. Sometimes corporations deliberately use global value chains to instill and exacerbate competition between suppliers and countries for their own benefit.

References

  1. Cross-country comparisons. Natsional’nyy statisticheskiy komitet Respubliki Belarus’. 2020. [National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. 2020]. Available at: https://www.belstat.gov.by/oficialnaya-statistika/realny-sector-economiki/promyshlennost/mezhstranovye-sopostavleniya/ (accessed 10.09.2021).
  2. Platezhnyy balans, mezhdunarodnaya investitsionnaya pozitsiya i valovyy vneshniy dolg Respubliki Belarus’ za 2020 god [Balance of payments, international investment position and gross external debt of the Republic of Belarus for 2020]. Minsk, 2020. Available at: https://www.nbrb.by.publications.baypay/balpay2020.pdf (accessed 10.09.2021).
  3. Larson C. China’s wealthy provinces are moving hazardous industries to the country’s poorest regions. Bloomberg Businessweek, 2019. Available at: https://chinalogist.ru/book/articles/perevody/bogatyeprovincii-kitaya-perenosyat-vrednye-proizodstva-v-bedneyshie-regiony (accessed 10.09.2021).
  4. Smog na eksport: Kitay perenosit zavody v Rossiyu [Smog for export: China moves factories to Russia]. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/business/2016/04/160407_china_plants_in_russia (accessed 10.09.2021).
  5. Doklad o mirovykh investitsiyakh [World Investment Report]. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/development/surveys/docs/investments2001.pdf (accessed 10.09.2021).
  6. Doklad o naimeneye razvitykh stranakh, 2020. Proizvodstvennyy potentsial na predstoyashcheye desyatiletiye [Least Developed Countries Report, 2020. Productive Capacities for the Coming Decade]. Geneva, 2020. 31 p.
  7. Vazhneyshiye svyazi. Sodeystviye rostu i ustoychivosti ekonomik v regione Yevropy i Tsentral’noy Azii [The most important connections. Promoting Economic Growth and Resilience in the Europe and Central Asia Region]. Geneva, Vsemirnyy bank Publ., 2018. 78 p.
  8. Nematerial’nyy kapital v global’nykh tsepochkakh sozdaniya stoimosti: Doklad 2017 g. o polozhenii v oblasti intellektual’noy sobstvennosti v mire [Intangible Capital in Global Value Chains: Report on the State of Intellectual Property]. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/ru/wipo_pub_944_2017.pdf (accessed 10.09.2021).
  9. Cole H. L., Ohanian L. E., Riascos A., Schmitz Jr. J. A. Latin America in the rearview mirror. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2005, no. 52 (1), pp. 69–107. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeemoneco/v_3a52_3ay_3a2005_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a69-107.htm (accessed 10.09.2021).
  10. Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 2009, no. 21 (1), pp. 9–37. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09692290.2012.756414 (accessed 02.09.2021).
  11. The Enclave Economy: Foreign Investment and Sustainable Development in Mexico’s Silicon Valley. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2007. Available at: https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/3233/The-Enclave-EconomyForeign-Investment-and (accessed 02.09.2021).
  12. Value creation and value capture in the automotive industry: Empirical evidence from Czechia. Environment and Planning, 2013, no. 48 (5), pp. 937–959. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v48y2016i5p937-959.html (accessed 10.09.2021).
  13. Global production networks and industrial upgrading: Negative lessons from Malaysian electronics. Austrian Journal of Development Studies, 2009, no. 25 (2), pp. 38–61. Available at: https://www.mattersburgerkreis.at/site/de/shop/jepartikel/shop.item/187.html (accessed 08.09.2021).
  14. Doklad o torgovle i razvitii, 2016 [Trade and Development Report, 2016]. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdr2016_ru.pdf (accessed 08.09.2021).
  15. Globalization, Poverty and Inequality: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Cambridge, MA, Polity Press, 2005. Available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/5860/ (accessed 09.09.2021).
  16. Outsourcing Economics: Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2013. Available at: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/26995/copyright/9781107026995_copyright_info.pdf (accessed 09.09.2021).
  17. Trading Down: Africa, Value Chains, and the Global Economy. Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press, 2005. Available at: https://assets.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-modern-african-studies/article/abs/trading-down-africa-value-chains-and-the-global-economy-by-peter-gibbon-and-stefano-ponte-philadelphiapa-temple-university-press-2005-pp-251-us-6450-us2195-pbk/03C492BD7675CDCB26F5D174B3655929 (accessed 09.09.2021).
  18. Rogatnykh Ye. Global value chains and their impact on the development of the national economy. Mirovoye i natsional’noye khozyaystvo [World and national economy], 2017, no. 4 (39), pp. 40–60. Available at: https://mirec.mgimo.ru/upload/ckeditor/files/mirec-2016-4-rogatnykh.pdf (accessed 10.09.2021).
16.09.2021